Archive for Small Business

IRS Notice 2008-1 Health Insurance Costs of 2% Shareholder-Employees

Under IRS Notice 2008-1, if you are an owner of more than 2% of an S corporation and you have a health insurance policy in your name with premiums paid by the corporation basically a plan has been established by the corporation for you the shareholder. This is not a self insured plan. It is simply health insurance premiums paid or furnished by an S corporation.

Also the premium payments are included in the wages for income tax withholding purposes on your Form W-2, but are not considered wages subject to social security and Medicare taxes if the requirements for exclusion under §3121(a)(2)(B) are satisfied meaning that medical or hospitalization expenses were incurred in connection with sickness or accident disability.

Currently there are no discrimination provisions under §106 dealing with contributions by employers to accident and health plans. As a shareholder you are allowed an exclusion from gross income for the insurance cost if you meet the requirements of §162(l) which states as follows:

“In the case of a taxpayer who is an employee within the meaning of section 401 (c)(1), there shall be allowed as a deduction under this section an amount equal to the amount paid during the taxable year for insurance which constitutes medical care for the taxpayer spouse or dependent children … No deduction shall be allowed under paragraph (1) to the extent that the amount of such deduction exceeds the taxpayer’s earned income (within the meaning of section 401 (c)) derived by the taxpayer from the trade or business with respect to which the plan providing the medical care coverage is established.”

How to calculate stock and loan basis in an S Corp for tax purposes

If you are a shareholder of an S corporation you are responsible for keeping track of your own basis (investment value) in the S corporation of which you own shares.  Tracking shareholder basis is usually not the S corporation’s responsibility.

You can have stock basis and loan basis, which are usually adjusted each year based on the S corporation’s operations. 

It is important to annually calculate your shareholders basis in the S corporation stock you own for the following reasons:

• You can claim losses and deductions passed through on Schedule K-1 to the extent of their stock and loan basis [§1366(d)(1)].

• If you receive a non-dividend distribution from the S corporation, it’s nontaxable to the extent of you stock basis [§1368(b)(1)].

• When you disposes of the S corporation stock, gain or loss on the disposition is calculated using you stock basis.

Stock basis starts with your initial contribution of capital to the S corporation’s capital account or the price paid for the stock. This amount is adjusted annually, as of the last day of the S corporation year, in the following order [Reg. §1.1367-1(f)]:

(1) Increased by all income including tax-exempt income reported on Schedule K-1 and excess depletion.

(2) Decreased by property distributions including cash made by the S corporation that are reported on Schedule K-1 in Box 16 with code D.

(3) Decreased by nondeductible non capital expenses, such as illegal bribes, kickbacks, fines and penalties, expenses and interest related to tax-exempt income, and the nondeductible portion of meals and entertainment.

(4) Decreased by deductible losses and deductions reported on Schedule K-1.

Stock basis can never go below zero.

If non dividend distributions exceed stock basis, the excess is taxed as capital gain on your personal return [§1368(b)(2)].

If deductible losses and deductions exceed stock basis, they can be deducted to the extent you have loan basis and any amount in excess of loan basis is suspended and carried over to the succeeding tax year.

You can elect to reduce your stock basis by deductible losses and deductions before decreasing their basis by non deductible expenses [Reg. §1.1367-1(g)]. If this election is made and nondeductible expenses exceed your stock and loan basis, the excess retains its character and is carried over to the succeeding tax year. If the election is not made, any excess nondeductible expenses are lost, not suspended and not carried over.

Loan basis starts with a loan substantiated with loan documentation from you the shareholder of the S corporation to the S corporation. In other words, it includes a traditional, written note with a reasonable stated rate of interest. It does not include third party loans to the S corporation that you guarantee or co-signs.

Loan basis is adjusted as follows:

• Losses and deductions (deductible and nondeductible) passed through on Schedule K-1 reduce stock basis before they reduce loan basis.

Loan basis can never go below zero. If deductible losses and deductions exceed your stock and loan basis, the excess is suspended and carried over.

• If there are different types of losses and deductions, the allowable loss and deduction items must be prorated.

• If loan basis has been reduced by pass-through losses and deductions, any net increase in a subsequent year restores the reduced loan basis before it increases your stock basis [Reg. §1.1367-2(c)].

A net increase is the amount by which the increases to stock basis exceed the decreases to stock basis including non dividend distributions.

• Non dividend distributions are not taxable if there is a “net increase” for the year, even if you have no stock basis.

• Reduced loan basis is restored by any “net increase” for the year before any loan repayments during the year are taken into account [Reg. §1.1367-2(d)(1)].

These loan repayments must be allocated in part to a return of your basis and in part to the receipt of income. If the loan is a written note, the note is a capital asset and the income will be capital gain.

As an S corporation shareholder you must establish that you have enough basis in the S corporation before you can claim any pass-through losses or deductions. Basically S corporation shareholders usually tend to get into trouble when they assume that non dividend distributions from an S corporation are entirely nontaxable. Be sure to verify that the distribution does not exceed your stock basis. Also be sure to be aware of the various ordering rules for adjusting stock and loan basis in an S corporation.

The New Home Office Deduction Safe Harbor – IRS Rev. Proc. 2013-13

The Internal Revenue Service announced a simplified option that many owners of home-based businesses and some home-based workers may use to figure their deductions for the business use of their homes. The new simplified option is available starting with the 2013 return most taxpayers file early in 2014. Further details on the new option can be found in

IRS Revenue Procedure 2013-13

This Rev. Proc. provides an optional safe harbor method that may be used to determine the amount of deductible expenses attributable to certain business use of a residence during the taxable year.  This safe harbor method is an alternative to the calculation, allocation, and substantiation of actual expenses for purposes of satisfying the requirements of § 280A of the Internal Revenue Code.

The new optional deduction, capped at $1,500 per year based on $5 a square foot for up to 300 square feet, will reduce the paperwork and record keeping burden on small businesses by an estimated 1.6 million hours annually. It also provides eligible taxpayers an easier path to claiming the home office deduction. Currently, they are generally required to fill out a IRS Form 8829 calculating allocated expenses, depreciation and carryovers of unused deductions.  Taxpayers claiming the optional deduction will complete a significantly simplified form.

Though homeowners using the new option cannot depreciate the portion of their home used in a trade or business, they can claim allowable mortgage interest, real estate taxes and casualty losses on the home as itemized deductions on Schedule A. These deductions need not be allocated between personal and business use, as is required under the regular method.

Business expenses unrelated to the home, such as advertising, supplies and wages paid to employees are still fully deductible.

Current restrictions on the home office deduction, such as the requirement that a home office must be used regularly and exclusively for business and the limit tied to the income derived from the particular business, still apply under the new option.

This new option is available starting with the 2013 return most taxpayers file early in 2014.

Withholding Tax for Social Security Goes to 6.2% of Wages

Contrary to the manufactured ‘news’ dribbling out of the main stream media to sell advertising, last week the IRS published updated employer’s withholding guidance clearly stating that employers are to now withhold Social Security tax at the rate of 6.2 percent of wages rather than the previous rate of 4.2 percent in place for the past two years.

Alas THOSE OF US IN THE ‘MIDDLE CLASS’ WITH JOBS ARE ALL PAYING MORE TAX!!

The ‘Fiscal Cliff’ and Your Tax Obligations

Our esteemed President has proven to me to be extraordinarily disingenuous with his statements about the middle class and their purported tax obligations as pretty much everyone’s taxes will go up in 2013 as a direct result of the cumulative efforts of our ‘elected officials’ over the last few days.  Please don’t get me wrong as I find the man’s leadership in most regards to be much more stoic than any other President in my life time.

What I find particularly galling however is that everyone it seems from pundits to established economists speak about the need to create jobs in America as the best way to reduce the deficit. I believe as a matter of principal that the best way to create jobs from a policy or legislative perspective is to drastically reduce employment tax and to completely eliminate self employment tax as these are some of the biggest costs and risks associated with being an employer or job creator.

Either way if you would like to read the actual legislation a pdf version can be found here at the US Government Printing Office and summaries can be found here at the Library of Congress.  The following are some highlights of what to expect:

Starting in 2013, there will be a new 39.6% rate placed on these thresholds:

  • Married Filing Jointly: $450,000 of taxable income

  • Qualifying Widow(er):  $450,000 of taxable income

  • Head of Household: $425,000 of taxable income

  • Single: $400,000 of taxable income

  • Married Filing Separately: $225,000 of taxable income

Starting in 2013 the tax rates on long-term gains would be:

  • 0% if income falls below the 25% tax bracket

  • 15% if income falls at or above the 25% tax bracket but below the new 39.6% rate

  • 20% if income falls in the 39.6% tax bracket

The Senate proposes the following AMT exemption amounts for 2012 indexed for inflation starting after 2012:

  • Married Filing Jointly: $78,750

  • Qualifying Widow(er): $78,750

  • Single: $50,600

  • Head of Household: $50,600

  • Married Filing Separately: $39,375

The proposed threshold amounts at which itemized deductions would start to be limited are:

  • Married Filing Jointly: $300,000 of AGI

  • Qualifying Widow(er): $300,000 of AGI

  • Head of Household: $275,000 of AGI

  • Single: $250,000 of AGI

  • Married Filing Separately: $150,000 of AGI

The Senate proposes to re-instate the personal exemption phase-out starting in 2013. Taxpayers would see their total personal exemptions reduced by two percent for each $2,500 by which adjusted gross income exceeds the threshold. The proposed threshold amounts for 2013:

  • Married Filing Jointly: $300,000 of AGI

  • Qualifying Widow(er): $300,000 of AGI

  • Head of Household: $275,000 of AGI

  • Single: $250,000 of AGI

  • Married Filing Separately: $150,000 of AGI

The Senate proposes that the following tax provisions be extended through the end of the year 2017:

  • American Opportunity Credit

  • Child Tax Credit at $1,000 maximum and partially refundable

  • Earned Income Credit for 3 or more dependents

The following provisions would be extended through 2013:

  • Educator expenses deduction

  • Exclusion for cancellation of debt on primary residences

  • Mass transit and parking benefits excluded from income set at maximum of $175 per month.

  • Mortgage insurance premium deduction

  • Deduction for state and local sales taxes

  • Charitable deduction for donating real property for conservation purposes

  • Tuition and fees deduction

  • Exclusion for charitable distributions from individual retirement accounts

S Corp Late Filing Penalty Excused IRC 6699 Ensyc Technologies v. Commissioner

Considering the scope of the reasonable cause language to the Code Sec. 6699 penalty for late filing of an S corporation return, the Tax Court determined that the failure to timely file a 2008 2008 1120-S tax return was due to reasonable cause not subject to penalty in Ensyc Technologies v. Comm’r, T.C. Summary 2012-55 (6/14/12). The following are the facts as I understand:

1. Ensyc Technologies, an S corporation operated entirely by its president who works from his home in Idaho with the assistance of subcontractors, had its tax returns prepared by an accountant in Nevada.

2. Ensyc’s annual tax return for 2008 was due March 16, 2009.

3. On March 10, 2009, Ensyc’s accountant sent Ensyc IRS Form 1120S, U.S. Income Tax Return for an S Corporation, to file with the IRS. The accountant also sent copies of Schedules K-1, Shareholder’s Share of Income, Deductions, Credits.

4. Ensyc’s files contained a copy of a Form 1120S bearing the President’s signature dated March 16, 2009.

5. The IRS has record receiving a Form 1120S from Ensyc on September 11, 2009 postmarked September 8, 2009.

6. The 1120-S form itself was dated February 24, 2009.

7. Code Sec. 6699 basically states that an S corporation not timely filing its annual tax return is liable for a per-shareholder penalty for every month the tax return is late up to 12 months. However the penalty is not imposed if the failure to timely file the return is due to reasonable cause.

8. On the theory that the Form 1120S it received on September 11, 2009, was the only Form 1120S Ensyc had filed for tax year 2008, the IRS assessed a $6,408 late-filing penalty.

9. On February 1, 2010, Ensyc requested a collection-review hearing with the Office of Appeals regarding levy action.

10. The IRS Office of Appeals determined that Ensyc did not timely file a Form 1120S nor did it have reasonable cause for failing to timely file the form and sustained the levy.

11. Ensyc took the case to the Tax Court, arguing that it was not liable for the late-filing penalty because it mailed a Form 1120S on March 16, 2009.

12. The Tax Court examined the possible explanations for why the IRS had no record of receiving the Form 1120S and essentially determined that the tax return was not timely mailed.

13. The Tax Court then considered whether there was reasonable cause for not filing the form on time noting that no judicial opinion had yet considered the scope of the reasonable cause exception to the Code Sec. 6699 penalty.

14. The court  applied the ordinary-business-care-and-prudence test from IRC 6651 concluding that Ensyc exercised ordinary business care and prudence in its efforts to timely file its Form 1120S for 2008.

15. The Tax Court specifically noted that the President routinely mailed Ensyc’s tax returns on time. Further he mailed the Schedules K-1 to Ensyc’s shareholders and that an Ensyc shareholder filed an annual individual income-tax return on April 15, 2009 reflecting the shareholder’s pass through loss.

16. The court believed the President’s testimony that he thought he had mailed the 2008 Form 1120S on March 16, 2009. As a result, the court found that Ensyc’s failure to timely file a Form 1120S for the 2008 tax year was due to reasonable cause and, thus, Ensyc was not liable for the Code Sec. 6699 penalty.

17. It was also noted that pursuant to INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), this opinion may not be treated as precedent for any other case.

I think the lesson learned here is to file on time and avoid the penalty.

IRS Form 1040 Line 21 and Subsequent CP2000 Notices

IRS CP2000 notices are annoying for a wide variety of reasons but mostly because the IRS assumes that most all items reported on line 21 of IRS From 1040 are subject to self-employment (SE) tax.

Much of what goes on line 21 (trustee fees for executors, prizes and awards, gambling winnings, cancellation of debt income, foreign pensions) is NOT subject to SE tax. What is driving this CP 2000 project inside the IRS causing all these no-change audit determinations?

First I learned the notices are reviewed inside the IRS prior to issuance, but it appears that the old e-file system did not provide the “dotted line” between the explanation provided on the return and the amount reported on line 21. Second and more importantly even though most of what goes on line 21 is not subject to Self Employment tax, the IRS finds that many taxpayers (and preparers) routinely include items subject to SE tax on line 21. Or in the opinion of the IRS many preparers and taxpayers prepare the form incorrectly without fully recognizing the implications of their entries on line 21. The result is that in many cases IRS’ proposed assessments are correct. The bottom line is to really understand the items being reported on line 21 of IRS Form 1040 and do not report any items here that may be subject to SE tax.

Self Employed Health Insurance Insurance Deduction: Worksheet v. IRS Publication 535

If you qualify to take the deduction, use the Self-Employed Health Insurance Deduction Worksheet to figure the amount you can deduct. However use IRS Publication 535 instead if any of the following applies.

  • You had more than one source of income subject to self-employment tax.

  • You file Form 2555 or 2555-EZ.

  • You are using amounts paid for qualified long-term care insurance to figure the deduction.

According to IRS INSTRUCTIONS you may be able to deduct the amount you paid for health insurance for yourself, your spouse, and your dependents. The insurance can also cover your child who was under age 27 at the end of 2011, even if the child was not your dependent. A child includes your son, daughter, stepchild, adopted child, or foster child.

Self-Employed Health Insurance Deduction Worksheet

  • If, during 2011, you were an eligible trade adjustment assistance (TAA) recipient, alternative TAA (ATAA) recipient, reemployment TAA (RTAA) recipient, or Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation pension recipient, see the instructions for Form 8885 to figure the amount to enter on line 1 of this worksheet.

  • Be sure you have read the Exception in the instructions for this line to see if you can use this worksheet instead of Pub. 535 to figure your deduction.

1.

Enter the total amount paid in 2011 for health insurance coverage established under your business

(or the S corporation in which you were a more-than-2% shareholder) for 2011 for you, your spouse, and your dependents. Your insurance can also cover your child who was under age 27 at the end of 2011, even if the child was not your dependent. But do not include amounts for any month you were eligible to participate in an employer-sponsored health plan or amounts paid from retirement plan distributions that were nontaxable because you are a retired public safety officer

1.

2.

Enter your net profit* and any other earned income** from the business under which the insurance plan is established, minus any deductions on Form 1040, lines 27 and 28. Do not include Conservation Reserve Program payments exempt from self-employment tax

2.

3.

Self-employed health insurance deduction. Enter the smaller of line 1 or line 2 here and on

Form 1040, line 29. Do not include this amount in figuring any medical expense deduction on Schedule A

3.

*If you used either optional method to figure your net earnings from self-employment, do not enter your net profit. Instead, enter the amount from Schedule SE, Section B, line 4b.

**Earned income includes net earnings and gains from the sale, transfer, or licensing of property you created. However, it does not include capital gain income. If you were a more-than-2% shareholder in the S corporation under which the insurance plan is established, earned income is your Medicare wages (box 5 of Form W-2) from that corporation.

One of the following statements must be true.

  • You were self-employed and had a net profit for the year.

  • You were a partner with net earnings from self-employment.

  • You used one of the optional methods to figure your net earnings from self-employment on Schedule SE.

  • You received wages in 2011 from an S corporation in which you were a more-than-2% shareholder. Health insurance premiums paid or reimbursed by the S corporation are shown as wages on Form W-2.

The insurance plan must be established under your business. Your personal services must have been a material income-producing factor in the business. If you are filing Schedule C, C-EZ, or F, the policy can be either in your name or in the name of the business.

If you are a partner, the policy can be either in your name or in the name of the partnership. You can either pay the premiums yourself or your partnership can pay them and report them as guaranteed payments. If the policy is in your name and you pay the premiums yourself, the partnership must reimburse you and report the premiums as guaranteed payments.

If you are a more-than-2% shareholder in an S corporation, the policy can be either in your name or in the name of the S corporation. You can either pay the premiums yourself or the S corporation can pay them and report them as wages. If the policy is in your name and you pay the premiums yourself, the S corporation must reimburse you. You can deduct the premiums only if the S corporation reports the premiums paid or reimbursed as wages in box 1 of your Form W-2 in 2011 and you also report the premium payments or reimbursements as wages on Form 1040, line 7.

But if you were also eligible to participate in any subsidized health plan maintained by your or your spouse’s employer for any month or part of a month in 2011, amounts paid for health insurance coverage for that month cannot be used to figure the deduction. Also, if you were eligible for any month or part of a month to participate in any subsidized health plan maintained by the employer of either your dependent or your child who was under age 27 at the end of 2011, do not use amounts paid for coverage for that month to figure the deduction.

If you were eligible to participate in a subsidized health plan maintained by your spouse’s employer from September 30 through December 31, you cannot use amounts paid for health insurance coverage for September through December to figure your deduction.

Medicare premiums you voluntarily pay to obtain insurance that is similar to qualifying private health insurance can be used to figure the deduction. Amounts paid for health insurance coverage from retirement plan distributions that were nontaxable because you are a retired public safety officer cannot be used to figure the deduction.

If you qualify to take the deduction, use the Self-Employed Health Insurance Deduction Worksheet to figure the amount you can deduct. However use IRS Publication 535 instead of the Self-Employed Health Insurance Deduction Worksheet in these instructions to figure your deduction if any of the following applies.

  • You had more than one source of income subject to self-employment tax.

  • You file Form 2555 or 2555-EZ.

  • You are using amounts paid for qualified long-term care insurance to figure the deduction.

IRS Forms 8941 + 3800 Calculating + Claiming Small Business Health Care Tax Credit

For tax years 2010 to 2013, the maximum credit for eligible small business employers under the Small Business Health Care Tax Credit is 35 percent of premiums paid and for eligible tax-exempt employers the maximum credit is 25 percent of premiums paid.  Beginning in 2014, the maximum credit will go up to 50 percent of qualifying premiums paid by eligible small business employers and 35 percent of qualifying premiums paid by eligible tax-exempt organizations.

Start by determining if your organization qualifies for the credit by assessing whether it has less than 25 full-time equivalent employees that earn an average wage of less than $50,000 a year and your organization pays at least half of employee health insurance premiums. If your organization meets this criteria it is referred to as a “qualifying business.” Next use IRS Form 8941 Credit for Small Employer Health Insurance Premiums. Last use IRS Form 3800, General Business Credit, to claim the credit.

Tax-exempt organizations can use IRS Form 8941 to calculate the credit and then claim the credit on IRS Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return.

If your organization couldn’t use the credit in 2011 there may be eligible to claim it in future years. Eligible small employers can claim the credit for 2010 through 2013 and for two additional years beginning in 2014.

Also be sure to check out the IRS’ YouTube Video on the topic

US Treasury SS-8 Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Tax

In my dealings with the US Treasury Department regarding worker classification disputes I have learned that although in reality there may be shades of gray distinguishing between what constitutes an employee and what constitutes an independent contractor the US Treasury has some very specific positions.  Here are four that will hopefully help you make the correct determination and avoid future problems:

1. A relationship between an employer and an employee exists when the person for whom the services are performed has the right to control and direct the individual who performs the services, not only as to what is to be done, but also how it is to be done.  It is not necessary that the employer actually direct or control the individual, it is sufficient that the employer merely has the right to do so. The designation of a worker as an agent, sub-contractor or independent contractor is irrelevant if the relationship of employer and employee exists.  The degree of importance of each factor varies depending on the occupation and the factual context in which the services are performed.

2. A worker who is required to comply with another person’s instructions about when, where and how he or she is to work is ordinarily an employee.  This control factor is present if the person or persons for whom the services are performed have the right to require compliance with instructions.  Some employees may work without receiving instructions because they are highly proficient and conscientious workers or because the duties are so simple or familiar to them.  Furthermore, instructions, that show how to reach the desired results, may have been oral and given only once at the beginning of the relationship.

3. Lack of significant investment by a person in facilities or equipment used in performing services for another indicates dependence on the employer and, accordingly, the existence of an employer-employee relationship.  The term “significant investment” does not include tools, instruments, and clothing commonly provided by employees in their trade; nor does it include education, experience or training.

4. A person who can realize a profit or suffer a loss as a result of his or her services is generally an independent contractor, while the person who cannot is an employee.  “Profit or loss” implies the use of capital by a person in an independent business of his or her own.  The risk that a worker will not receive payment for his or her services, however, is common to both independent contractors and employees and, thus, does not constitute a sufficient economic risk to support treatment as an independent contractor. If a worker loses payment from the firm’s customer for poor work, the firm shares the risk of such loss. Control of the firm over the worker would be necessary in order to reduce the risk of financial loss to the firm. The opportunity for higher earnings or of gain or loss from a commission arrangement is not considered profit or loss.